Are managed investment funds making a comeback?

Are managed investment funds making a comeback?
About this post

2013 was a big year for Australian fund managers with the average fund outperforming the sharemarket by 18% which was the largest gain in 25 years. This mouth-watering return was largely due to fund managers avoiding investments in the resources and property sectors. The top performing fund for 2013 was Lazard Asset Management which recorded a return for the year of 36.6%.

Managed investment funds (unit trusts) have come under a lot of criticism over the last few years due to their high management fees and in many cases inability to outperform the index. In a stellar year the average Australian fund returned 23.2% in the 12 months to December 31 before fees, versus 19.7% gain in the S&P ASX 300 (Mercer consultancy).

Is this a beginning of resurgence for managed investment funds?

Passive funds (which mean your portfolios tracks an index) run by computer models were hit hard this year as active fund managers removed underperforming assets from their portfolio. While Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) and passive funds grow in popularity due to their simplicity and low fees, investors are missing out on the extra alpha (return) by using these types of passive securities.

There were big inflows in 2013 into balanced investment funds which offer a mix of growth and defensive assets for investors. They now account for 12% of managed funds as they prove to be able to handle high volatility situations and can have a range of asset classes pooled into one fund. They might include an allocation to growth assets such as property or shares, or hold cash to smooth out the volatility. Balanced investment funds aim to return 5% above the rate of inflation which means they will tend to underperform shares but outperform cash over a period.

Large fund managers have been incorporating ‘sustainability’ to their investment principles. There has been a demand for portfolios to invest in companies on the basis of their social, environment and financial credentials. Australian Ethical, an international equity trust fund had a bumper 2013 year with a return of 55.2%. They will not invest in industries that may include tobacco, alcohol and gaming which means their returns will be quite different to the overall performance of the Australian economy.

Over the last 3 years, fund managers, who dumped resource companies in favour of income producing stocks earned some of the biggest returns for investors. 2013 was an outstanding year for active fund managers who outperformed passive funds by a considerable margin. ETF’s are a cheap way of mirroring the performance to an index at a low cost. However like all ETF’s it means you’re exposed to poor performing stocks and high performing stocks within the index.

Identifying high performing stocks will always be the sixty four thousand dollar question. Active fund managers have earned their fees in 2013 and rewarded their investors with higher returns regaining some of the lost confidence by the investor public to consider a managed investment approach again. 

Find out more about investment funds with RateCity's Investment Funds Guide.

This is an information service. By browsing on the website and/or using our search tools, you are asking RateCity to provide you with information about products from multiple financial institutions. We will try to show you a range of products in response to your request for information. The search results do not include all providers and may not compare all features relevant to you, for further details refer to our FSCG. The rating shown is only one factor to take into account when considering these products. We are not a credit provider, and in giving you product information we are not making any suggestion or recommendation to you about a particular credit product. If you decide to apply for a product, you will deal directly with a financial institution, and not with RateCity. Rates and product information should be confirmed with the relevant financial institution, and you should review the PDS before you decide to purchase. See our terms of use for further details. This advice is general and has not taken into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether this advice is right for you.