Fat Cat super funds: Who tops the list this year?

Fat Cat super funds: Who tops the list this year?
About this post

Industry super funds continue to outperform most retail funds while managing to keep fees relatively low for members a new report shows.

Stockspot has released their annual report of Fat Cat super funds who fail to outperform the average benchmark in returns over a one, three and five-year period while still charging high fees to customers.

Topping the list of Fat Cat fund providers were ANZ, AMP/AXA and Westpac with ANZ taking out the top spot for the third year running.

There were a total of 638 Fat Cat funds identified which is down from the 701 funds identified in the 2015 report.

On the other end of the market, 574 Fit Cat funds were identified with Investors Mutual, SG Hiscock and Company and REST Industry Super leading the pack.

“There is a serious message at the heart of this report,” said Chris Brycki, founder at Stockspot.

“Too many Australians are unaware of the devastating impact high fees have on their long term savings.”

Based on average annual incomes, media professionals, financial and insurance workers, scientists and those in the mining industry were likely to lose upwards of $300,000 to high fees if they remained in a Fat Cat fund over their career.

This amount of money could have significant impacts on the lifestyle one is able to lead in retirement and shouldn’t be dismissed as inevitable when there are other options available.

If you would like to see how your super fund performed you can see a report here.

Related links

This is an information service. By browsing on the website and/or using our search tools, you are asking RateCity to provide you with information about products from multiple financial institutions. We will try to show you a range of products in response to your request for information. The search results do not include all providers and may not compare all features relevant to you, for further details refer to our FSCG. The rating shown is only one factor to take into account when considering these products. For superannuation products, see the rating methodology. We are not a credit provider, and in giving you product information we are not making any suggestion or recommendation to you about a particular credit product. If you decide to apply for a product, you will deal directly with a financial institution, and not with RateCity. Rates and product information should be confirmed with the relevant financial institution, and you should review the PDS before you decide to purchase. See our terms of use for further details. This advice is general and has not taken into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether this advice is right for you. This information service uses data and research provided by SuperRatings (ASFL: 311800), which provides general information on superannuation. Read more about SuperRatings’ information service and how their ratings work. As with all investments, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.