- Home
- Savings Accounts
- News
- Statements heard at competition inquiry
Statements heard at competition inquiry
The initial stages of the Productivity Commission inquiry into competition in Australia’s financial system are now underway, with regulatory and industry bodies making statements to a roundtable hearing held in Melbourne yesterday.
The inquiry was first announced in May 2017 by Treasurer Scott Morrison, just prior to the release of the Federal Budget. The goal of the inquiry is to ensure that Australia’s financial system is competitive and innovative, in order to deliver better outcomes to consumers and small businesses.
Smaller banks want to level the playing field
Australia’s mutual banks, credit unions and building societies are in a position to offer a meaningful financial alternative to Australia’s big banks, but lack the regulatory framework to do so, according to a statement from the Customer Owned Banking Association (COBA) CEO, Mark Degotardi:
“(Customer-owned banking institutions) provide the full range of retail banking products and services, including home loans, credit cards, personal loans, transaction accounts and term deposits. What they don’t have is a level playing field.”
COBA called on the Productivity Commission to consider the implicit guarantee enjoyed by Australia’s big banks from taxpayers, as well as the level of regulatory capital they hold against their mortgages.
COBA also called on the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to give greater consideration to the impact that their regulatory decisions make on competition in the financial sector.
APRA has its limits
APRA Chairman Wayne Byres also made a statement to the roundtable hearing, warning that there are limits to what the regulatory body can do about financial competition:
“APRA does not have oversight of the entirety of the Australian financial system… Deposit-takers, insurance companies and superannuation funds make up a large proportion of the financial system, of course, but it is important to bear in mind – particularly in the context of any consideration of competition – that there are a great many financial products and service providers that are free to operate outside APRA’s purview.”
Mr Byres also warned that while competition can lead to innovation and make life better for customers, overly intense competition can risk destabilising the broader economic landscape:
“We have not been concerned with lenders competing on price or service standards, but we have been concerned that intense competition was leading to a material erosion in lending standards. This was unhealthy both for individual institutions, and the long-run interests of the community as a whole.”
The inquiry is set to begin in earnest on 1 July 2017, and report its findings to the federal government by 1 July 2018.
Disclaimer
This article is over two years old, last updated on June 30, 2017. While RateCity makes best efforts to update every important article regularly, the information in this piece may not be as relevant as it once was. Alternatively, please consider checking recent savings accounts articles.
Compare savings accounts
5.75%
intro 4 months then 4.40%
4.40%
Not applicable
- 2024 Award Winner
- Intro offer rate
- Online banking
5.00%*
0.05%
*Deposit $20+ & make 5 purchases on a linked Ev...
- 2024 Award Winner
- Bonus interest with conditions
- App banking
- Online banking
- Linked account required
5.50%*
0.55%
*Deposit at least $1000, make 5+ card purchases...
- 2024 Award Winner
- Bonus interest with conditions
- App banking
- Online banking
- Linked account required
5.25%
intro 4 months then 3.25%*
Not Applicable
*Deposit at least $50 and make and no withdrawa...
- Bonus interest with conditions
- Intro offer rate
- App banking
- Online banking
Product database updated 18 Apr, 2024
Fact Checked
Share this page
Get updates on the latest financial news and products
By continuing, you agree to the RateCity Privacy Policy, Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
